<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Review of &quot;The Real Lincoln&quot; by Thomas J. DiLorenzo</title>
	<atom:link href="http://polemicscat.wordpress.com/2008/08/26/review-of-the-real-lincoln-by-thomas-dilorenzo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://polemicscat.wordpress.com/2008/08/26/review-of-the-real-lincoln-by-thomas-dilorenzo/</link>
	<description>Examining settled and unsettling questions.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 01:35:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: polemicscat</title>
		<link>http://polemicscat.wordpress.com/2008/08/26/review-of-the-real-lincoln-by-thomas-dilorenzo/#comment-87</link>
		<dc:creator>polemicscat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Sep 2008 01:25:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://polemicscat.wordpress.com/2008/08/26/review-of-the-real-lincoln-by-thomas-dilorenzo/#comment-87</guid>
		<description>NGPM, thanks for your comment.  As you indicate, there is quite a difference between a crooked party and a crooked party with support by the US military.  
I am acquainted with the kind of textbook you mention.  They indoctrinate rather than inform.  I would recommend DiLorenzo&#039;s book to anyone who wants more specific information about Reconstruction.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NGPM, thanks for your comment.  As you indicate, there is quite a difference between a crooked party and a crooked party with support by the US military.<br />
I am acquainted with the kind of textbook you mention.  They indoctrinate rather than inform.  I would recommend DiLorenzo&#8217;s book to anyone who wants more specific information about Reconstruction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NGPM</title>
		<link>http://polemicscat.wordpress.com/2008/08/26/review-of-the-real-lincoln-by-thomas-dilorenzo/#comment-86</link>
		<dc:creator>NGPM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 20:18:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://polemicscat.wordpress.com/2008/08/26/review-of-the-real-lincoln-by-thomas-dilorenzo/#comment-86</guid>
		<description>&quot;DiLorenzo also enumerates the many ways that the occupying forces in collusion with the Republican party plundered the economy of the Southern states.&quot;

I remember a university-level American History textbook that attempted to vindicate the Reconstruction.  The best defence they could muster was that (and I quote almost verbatim):  &quot;Democratic machines in the North probably stole more money than the Republican regimes in the South.&quot;  As if there was any comparison.  Democratic machines in the North were (and in some cities, remain) evil and twisted, but they were ordinary hoods riding off of immigrant populations that they deceived.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;DiLorenzo also enumerates the many ways that the occupying forces in collusion with the Republican party plundered the economy of the Southern states.&#8221;</p>
<p>I remember a university-level American History textbook that attempted to vindicate the Reconstruction.  The best defence they could muster was that (and I quote almost verbatim):  &#8220;Democratic machines in the North probably stole more money than the Republican regimes in the South.&#8221;  As if there was any comparison.  Democratic machines in the North were (and in some cities, remain) evil and twisted, but they were ordinary hoods riding off of immigrant populations that they deceived.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
